Pennsylvania + Wall



 

Pennsylvania + Wall provides commentary on a broad range of current financial, economic and regulatory reform topics. The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of SIFMA.

June 13, 2017

Business Spending and US Fiscal Policy Slightly Weaken GDP Outlook

By Kyle Brandon

On Monday, SIFMA’s Economic Advisory Roundtable announced it slightly weakened its GDP outlook for 2017 to 2.1%. The following is a Q&A with Kyle Brandon, Managing Director, Director of Research and staff advisor to the Roundtable.

SIFMA's Economic Advisory Roundtable lowered its GDP forecast from 2.2% to 2.1%. Was there a significant change in its view?

The Roundtable's outlook is slightly weaker numerically speaking, but is essentially the same as our estimate this past December. As it did then, the Roundtable considers business confidence to be the most important factor impacting U.S. economic growth, followed by U.S. fiscal policy (of note, the Roundtable's estimate for business capital investment strengthened considerably from 2.7% to 4.4%). This time around, Federal Reserve interest rate actions were noted as a distant third factor, whereas private credit market conditions made the list in December.

Risks to the forecast were more dispersed than our December survey, which focused on fiscal and trade policies. Fiscal stimulus, sooner-than-expected tax reform, and business capital expenditures were the most often cited risks on the upside. On the downside, policy uncertainty/failure, tight financial conditions and geopolitical risk were all noted.

Economic Outlook MY 2017

The Roundtable expects the Federal Open Market Committee will raise rates on Wednesday. What's the view for the rest of the year?

All but one respondent agreed the FOMC will raise rates this week. Similarly, all but one respondent expected two hikes in full-year 2017 inclusive of the June hike. Favorable labor market conditions were considered to be the most important factor; inflation and inflationary expectations were also taken into account. One respondent pointed out that political conditions could also be a factor.

Looking forward to 2018, there was much more variance. Half of respondents expect three rate hikes, with the other half split amongst one, two or four hikes.

 

 

The unemployment rate is at a near ten-year low, and continued improvement is expected. How does that affect the rest of the forecast?

Employment is expected to continue improving, and on a stronger basis than the Roundtable forecast in December. The Roundtable is now predicting a 4.4% unemployment rate in 2017, down from December's 4.7% forecast. This plays a role in the muted core inflation outlooks, where unemployment was cited as the dominant factor. One respondent noted that "each percentage point drop in the unemployment rate adds less to inflation risk compared to the past."

The Fed has continued to maintain its accommodative financial conditions by reinvesting proceeds from its Treasury, agency and mortgage securities holdings while noting in its last minute that there is an expectation that will change later this year. When does the Roundtable expect this reinvestment policy to change?

The entire Roundtable expects a change, with some forecasting as soon as the third quarter and the majority in the fourth quarter of 2017. The change will likely be implemented through a gradual phase-out of reinvestments and be based on a qualitative judgment about economic and financial conditions.

What policy changes under the Trump Administration could have the largest impact on the Roundtable's predictions?

Tax policy and infrastructure are expected to have a significant positive impact - if enacted. On the flipside, changes to immigration policy and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) would be negative. Tax policy is predicted to have the greatest chance of enactment, followed by changes to trade policies, immigration and the ACA. Only one respondent saw infrastructure policy as likely to be enacted.

The Administration has promised regulatory relief. Are certain financial regulations likely to be targeted?

The Department of Labor's fiduciary rule was considered the most likely candidate for reform, and is expected by mid-2018. The Roundtable was split on the chances for reform of the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR), leverage rules, prudential capital requirements, and the Volcker Rule. Reforms of the Orderly Liquidation and Securitization requirements were considered less likely. Overall, respondents did not expect any reforms to have significant impact on GDP growth: the majority expected no impact at all, with the rest expecting reforms to add up to 50 bps to their growth outlooks.

Just yesterday, the Treasury Department released recommendations for regulatory reform. This is the first of several reports following President Trump's Executive Order calling for review of the nation's financial regulatory framework and its impact on the markets and the economy.

 

Download the Outlook 

 

The mid-year 2017 survey was conducted from May 16, 2017 to June 2, 2017. The forecasts discussed in the text and appearing in the accompanying data tables and graphs are the median values of the individual member firms' submissions, unless otherwise specified.

SIFMA's 2017 Economic Advisory Roundtable  

Joseph LaVorgna (Chair), Deutsche Bank Securities Inc
Ethan Harris, Bank of America-Merrill Lynch
Michael Gapen, Barclays Capital Inc.
Nathaniel Carp, BBVA Compass
Douglas Porter, BMO Financial Group
Dana Peterson, Citigroup
Michael Carey, Credit Agricole
James Sweeney, Credit Suisse AG
Michael Moran, Daiwa Capital Markets America, Inc.
Christopher Low, FTN Financial
Jan Hatzius, Goldman, Sachs & Company
John Roberts, J.J.B. Hilliard, W.L. Lyons, LLC
Michael Feroli, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
Ward McCarthy, Jefferies & Co., Inc.
John Lonksi, Moody’s Analytics, Inc.
Ellen Zentner, Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc.
Lewis Alexander, Nomura Securities International, Inc.
Carl Tannenbaum, Northern Trust
Stuart Hoffman, PNC Financial Group
Scott J. Brown, Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
Tom Porcelli, RBC Capital Markets, Inc.
Stephen Gallagher, Société Générale Corporate and Investment Banking
Barry Bannister, Stifel Financial Corp.
Samuel Coffin, UBS Investment Bank
John Silvia, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

SIFMA Staff Advisors

Kyle Brandon, Managing Director, Director of Research
Sharon Sung, Assistant Vice President, Research

 
       1        


Comments:

We encourage you to submit comments, queries and suggestions on our blog entries. Comments must be relevant to the post, and contribute to a substantive and informed dialogue for our fellow blog readers. Comments are moderated and will post below the entry, subject to the guidelines found in the right-column.

Business Spending and US Fiscal Policy Slightly Weaken GDP Outlook

(Capital Markets) Permanent link

By Kyle Brandon

On Monday, SIFMA’s Economic Advisory Roundtable announced it slightly weakened its GDP outlook for 2017 to 2.1%. The following is a Q&A with Kyle Brandon, Managing Director, Director of Research and staff advisor to the Roundtable.

SIFMA's Economic Advisory Roundtable lowered its GDP forecast from 2.2% to 2.1%. Was there a significant change in its view?

The Roundtable's outlook is slightly weaker numerically speaking, but is essentially the same as our estimate this past December. As it did then, the Roundtable considers business confidence to be the most important factor impacting U.S. economic growth, followed by U.S. fiscal policy (of note, the Roundtable's estimate for business capital investment strengthened considerably from 2.7% to 4.4%). This time around, Federal Reserve interest rate actions were noted as a distant third factor, whereas private credit market conditions made the list in December.

Risks to the forecast were more dispersed than our December survey, which focused on fiscal and trade policies. Fiscal stimulus, sooner-than-expected tax reform, and business capital expenditures were the most often cited risks on the upside. On the downside, policy uncertainty/failure, tight financial conditions and geopolitical risk were all noted.

Economic Outlook MY 2017

The Roundtable expects the Federal Open Market Committee will raise rates on Wednesday. What's the view for the rest of the year?

All but one respondent agreed the FOMC will raise rates this week. Similarly, all but one respondent expected two hikes in full-year 2017 inclusive of the June hike. Favorable labor market conditions were considered to be the most important factor; inflation and inflationary expectations were also taken into account. One respondent pointed out that political conditions could also be a factor.

Looking forward to 2018, there was much more variance. Half of respondents expect three rate hikes, with the other half split amongst one, two or four hikes.

 

 

The unemployment rate is at a near ten-year low, and continued improvement is expected. How does that affect the rest of the forecast?

Employment is expected to continue improving, and on a stronger basis than the Roundtable forecast in December. The Roundtable is now predicting a 4.4% unemployment rate in 2017, down from December's 4.7% forecast. This plays a role in the muted core inflation outlooks, where unemployment was cited as the dominant factor. One respondent noted that "each percentage point drop in the unemployment rate adds less to inflation risk compared to the past."

The Fed has continued to maintain its accommodative financial conditions by reinvesting proceeds from its Treasury, agency and mortgage securities holdings while noting in its last minute that there is an expectation that will change later this year. When does the Roundtable expect this reinvestment policy to change?

The entire Roundtable expects a change, with some forecasting as soon as the third quarter and the majority in the fourth quarter of 2017. The change will likely be implemented through a gradual phase-out of reinvestments and be based on a qualitative judgment about economic and financial conditions.

What policy changes under the Trump Administration could have the largest impact on the Roundtable's predictions?

Tax policy and infrastructure are expected to have a significant positive impact - if enacted. On the flipside, changes to immigration policy and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) would be negative. Tax policy is predicted to have the greatest chance of enactment, followed by changes to trade policies, immigration and the ACA. Only one respondent saw infrastructure policy as likely to be enacted.

The Administration has promised regulatory relief. Are certain financial regulations likely to be targeted?

The Department of Labor's fiduciary rule was considered the most likely candidate for reform, and is expected by mid-2018. The Roundtable was split on the chances for reform of the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR), leverage rules, prudential capital requirements, and the Volcker Rule. Reforms of the Orderly Liquidation and Securitization requirements were considered less likely. Overall, respondents did not expect any reforms to have significant impact on GDP growth: the majority expected no impact at all, with the rest expecting reforms to add up to 50 bps to their growth outlooks.

Just yesterday, the Treasury Department released recommendations for regulatory reform. This is the first of several reports following President Trump's Executive Order calling for review of the nation's financial regulatory framework and its impact on the markets and the economy.

 

Download the Outlook 

 

The mid-year 2017 survey was conducted from May 16, 2017 to June 2, 2017. The forecasts discussed in the text and appearing in the accompanying data tables and graphs are the median values of the individual member firms' submissions, unless otherwise specified.

SIFMA's 2017 Economic Advisory Roundtable  

Joseph LaVorgna (Chair), Deutsche Bank Securities Inc
Ethan Harris, Bank of America-Merrill Lynch
Michael Gapen, Barclays Capital Inc.
Nathaniel Carp, BBVA Compass
Douglas Porter, BMO Financial Group
Dana Peterson, Citigroup
Michael Carey, Credit Agricole
James Sweeney, Credit Suisse AG
Michael Moran, Daiwa Capital Markets America, Inc.
Christopher Low, FTN Financial
Jan Hatzius, Goldman, Sachs & Company
John Roberts, J.J.B. Hilliard, W.L. Lyons, LLC
Michael Feroli, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
Ward McCarthy, Jefferies & Co., Inc.
John Lonksi, Moody’s Analytics, Inc.
Ellen Zentner, Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc.
Lewis Alexander, Nomura Securities International, Inc.
Carl Tannenbaum, Northern Trust
Stuart Hoffman, PNC Financial Group
Scott J. Brown, Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
Tom Porcelli, RBC Capital Markets, Inc.
Stephen Gallagher, Société Générale Corporate and Investment Banking
Barry Bannister, Stifel Financial Corp.
Samuel Coffin, UBS Investment Bank
John Silvia, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

SIFMA Staff Advisors

Kyle Brandon, Managing Director, Director of Research
Sharon Sung, Assistant Vice President, Research

 

Posted by Kate Zickel at 06/13/2017 04:36:03 PM | 


Leave a comment
Name *
Email *
Homepage
Comment


Join SIFMA

Learn How ›

Subscribe

Sign up for e-mail alerts:

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:


Enter ›

SIFMA Blog Sign-up by RSS feed



Contact

Katrina Cavalli
212.313.1181

 

Liz Pierce  

212.313.1173

 

Carol Danko
202.962.7390


Search Blog




Post a Comment

We encourage you to submit comments, queries and suggestions on our blog entries. Comments must be relevant to the post, and contribute to a substantive and informed dialogue for our fellow blog readers. We will post them below the entry, subject to the following guidelines:

View Guidelines

+
  • Please be thoughtful: Comments must be relevant to the post.
  • Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters. 
  • Please be prompt: Comments submitted more than one week after the blog entry appears may not be posted. 
  • Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. 

This is a community please treat others with respect.  Specifically, please refrain from comments that are:

  • self-promotional or commercial in nature;
  • investment advice, or mentions of individual stocks;
  • abusive, harassing, or threatening;
  • obscene or vulgar; or
  • as well as comments that constitute a personal attack.  

We reserve the right not to post a comment; no notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.

Please contact us directly if you have any questions or suggestions.
Kate Zickel
Michelle Vandamme
Jeana Zamanski


Market Data